I am currently involved in a project that will more than likely be less than successful from my point of view. This company will function and continue to thrive regardless of the effectiveness of this project. As of right now, this project is on-going and will continue for quite a few years. But, the return on the expenditures for this project will be dismal.
This business intelligence project involves three different groups of people from three different departments and all three have different opinions of what the project is and the way it should be implemented. In additional to these three different opinions, these three groups have also been involved in an internal political struggle for control over the project. Each group cannot vary from their position without a perceived loss of power within the organization.
Where the disconnect is occurring is in the details. My direct supervisor made a statement recently where he said, “I don’t have time to get into the details. Frankly, I shouldn’t have to.” This is a big problem. The project is having interdepartmental communication issues about very specific details, and the manager over the project doesn’t believe he should not have to deal with it.
Why these issues are occurring in the first place has to do with the knowledge of the methods by which you implement a business intelligence system. These two parties have never implemented a BI system before and are unaware of the nomenclature and methodologies that used during implementation. The one manager explicitly stated that he has no idea about the kind of work we do, but proceeds to tell us that we are doing our job wrong.
I am not looking for a manager that is in the details. I actually push back against that kind of behavior. It isn’t pretty. However, when there are team issues and interdepartmental issues, management needs to get involved at whatever level of detail that is necessary. Once that issue is resolved, I expect management to step back and let us do our jobs.
–Don’t stop